Possession with Purpose – Revised Introduction

It’s time to offer up another revised version of my Possession with Purpose Analysis.

My intent here is to:

  1. Provide an update that may help simplify this effort, and
  2. Update new links to articles most have found to be of great interest in the last year.

To begin… Possession with Purpose (PWP):

The End State, as always this is good to know up front:

Create an objective Strategic Family of Indices, with publicly made available data, that has relevance and helps identify (explain) the strengths and weaknesses of team performance ‘outside’ the realm of Points in the League Table.

Of note; this analysis has been presented, and received with great interest, at the World Conference on Science and Soccer of 2014.  So it’s not a fly-by-night attempt to offer up analysis that can’t translate back to the soccer and science industry or help inform the general, or well educated, soccer community (both here and across the pond) about Footy…

The Intent:

Create a Family of Indices that measure the ‘bell curve’ of strategic activities that occur in a game of football (soccer); recognizing that in order to score goals the following activities usually need to occur:

  1. Gain possession of the ball
  2. Move the ball
  3. Penetrate the opponents defending final third
  4. Generate a shot taken
  5. That ends up on target and,
  6. Gets past the keeper

From a statistical (measurement) standpoint those activities are organized into these six categories:

  1. Possession percentage
  2. Passing Accuracy across the Entire Pitch
  3. Passing Percentage within and into the Opponents Final Third compared to overall possession (i.e. = Penetration)
  4. Shots Taken per Percentage of Penetration
  5. Shots on Goal per Shots Taken
  6. Goals Scored per Shots on Goal

It’s not a secret formula but I do retain Copyright.

The Family of Strategic Indices – there are three of them:

  1. Attacking Possession with Purpose (APWP)
  2. Defending Possession with Purpose (DPWP)
  3. Composite Possession with Purpose (CPWP)

APWP Index:  How effective a team is in performing those six process steps throughout the course of a game.  Example:

APWP STRATEGIC INDEX END OF SEASON 2014 COMBINED

DPWP Index:  How effective the opponent is in performing those six process steps, throughout the course of a game, against you.  Example:

DPWP STRATEGIC INDEX BUNDESLIGA WEEK 17

CPWP Index:  The mathematical difference between the APWP Index and DPWP Index.  Example:

CPWP Strategic Index Week 22

The Analysis:

Simply stated, the analysis stemming from this effort is a comparison and contrast between how a team performs (in the bell curve of these activities) relative to other teams in their league “without” including points in the league table.

Statistical Correlation:

Last year the CPWP Strategic Index Correlation (relationship) to Points in the Table, for Major League Soccer, was .77; this year, at the end Week 26, the R is .85.

CPWP STRATEGIC INDEX END OF SEASON 2014 COMBINED

In returning back to the End State:

“Create an objective Strategic Family of Indices, with publicly made available data, that has relevance and helps identify the strengths and weaknesses of team performance ‘outside’ the realm of Points in the League Table.”

Given the very high level of Correlation these Indices have, I’d say this Family of Indices has considerable statistical relevance; and I should point out that although the PWP approach is an Explanatory Model it can also be leveraged as a Predictability Model.

After speaking with a number of folks at the World Conference on Science and Soccer (2014) it was agreed that the most effective way to turn this into a Predictability Model is to remove Goals Scored (in both Indices) and ‘see’ how the Composite Index takes shape after that.

Here’s an example of what I mean:

CPWP Predictability Index Week 22

A word or two of caution…

From a purely statistical viewpoint I do not see this as a Predictability Model that has direct relevance yet… why?

For the simple reason that there have not been 15 games played for all teams both Home and Away – teams show a tendency, for the most part to behave slightly different at home versus on the road…

Why the number 15?  I suppose it comes down to Confidence Level in the number of samples that are needed in order to forecast the future based upon the past…  with 34 games played in Major League Soccer you really need 15 games to reach that 95% Confidence Level limit in samples…

All that said, it is extremely inviting/inticing to see that even when Goals Scored (both for and against) are removed the CPWP Predictability Index still has a correlation (R) of .84…

Links to articles that have had extensive views over the last year and a way to get a taste of how PWP analyses might be able to help you, as a writer (through collaboration with me), better inform your audience about the nuance of soccer:

In Closing:

Others in mainstream media sometimes offer up subjective opinions that may not be substantiated with objective data; I won’t do that.

Every shred of analysis offered here will include some sort of objective data to support an opinion or conclusion.

Like any other mainstream business; statistical analysis provides objective data as a tool to leverage when looking to make business decisions.  It is not a substitute for the seasoned leadership needed to make final decisions.

I don’t advocate that this analysis is the ‘answer’ or the only tool that substantiates one view – in a soccer match, with 40,000 supporters in attendance, I’ve learned that those 40,000 supporters have 40,000 sets of eyes that see things differently.

On this site, this information and analyses presented, is merely my view, from my eyes, in how I see the game – hopefully, in order to make my future articles of better value, others will add their comments, thoughts, and questions.

Finally, I’m not sure how this will develop but I’ve been approached to provide a manuscript for this analytical effort – for publication in a Sports Science Journal.   More to follow on how that goes.  

Best, Chris

COPYRIGHT, All Rights Reserved.  PWP – Trademark

NOTE:  All data used to generate this analysis stems from OPTA through a number of open/public websites across Europe and America.

My thanks to OPTA and all those open websites for helping to facilitate my own analysis and potential improvements that may arise from this effort.

Advertisement

77 comments

  1. Pingback: Portland Timbers, Major League Soccer and Europe’s Elite Leagues | Possession with Purpose PWP
  2. Pingback: Using PWP as a Youth Coaching Tool | Possession with Purpose PWP
  3. Pingback: Portland Timbers and the MLS Playoffs | Possession with Purpose PWP
  4. Pingback: New York City – For Kreis Sake? | Possession with Purpose PWP
  5. Pingback: Possession with Purpose: 2015 In Review | Possession with Purpose PWP
  6. Pingback: MLS Week 1 – Possession with Purpose Recap | Possession with Purpose PWP
  7. Pingback: MLS Week 1 - Possession with Purpose Recap - Portland Timbers
  8. Pingback: MLS Week 1 - Possession with Purpose Recap - Clogs
  9. Pingback: MLS Week 1 - Possession with Purpose Recap - PTFCollective
  10. Pingback: MLS Week 2 Recap – Dynamo Decisively Dump Dallas | Possession with Purpose PWP
  11. Pingback: MLS Week 2 Recap - Dynamo Decisively Dump Dallas - Portland Timbers
  12. Pingback: MLS Week 2 Recap - Dynamo Decisively Dump Dallas - PTFCollective
  13. Pingback: Possession with Purpose is Published | Possession with Purpose PWP
  14. Pingback: MLS Week 3 Recap – Sporting KC Continues to Crush Competition | Possession with Purpose PWP
  15. Pingback: MLS Week 3 Recap and Power Rankings through Week 3 - Portland Timbers
  16. Pingback: MLS Recap Week 3 and PWP Power Rankings through Week 3 - PTFCollective
  17. Pingback: Moneyball 2 – Soccer Statistics – Taking it to the next level | Possession with Purpose PWP
  18. Pingback: Moneyball 2 - Soccer Statistics - Taking it to the next level - Clogs
  19. Pingback: COPA America 2016 – To Possess or Not to Possess? | Possession with Purpose PWP
  20. Pingback: COPA America 2016 To Possess or Not To Possess? - PTFCollective
  21. Pingback: Gluck – Predicting Team Standings in Professional Soccer | Possession with Purpose PWP
  22. Pingback: Gluck - Predicting Team Standings in Professional Soccer - PTFCollective
  23. Pingback: Gluck - Predicting Team Standings in Professional Soccer - Portland Timbers
  24. Pingback: Gluck - Predicting Team Standings in Professional Soccer - Clogs