Tagged: Juventus

UEFA Champions League – Some great games coming!!!

The greatest professional team soccer competition continues…

But before digging into the Possession with Purpose Family of Indices some general news for consideration.

As the PWP Indices have shown such a strong correlation/relationship to the league tables without using points earned, in ALL competitions measured, I want to try a create a quantifiable way to measure “luck”.   More to follow…

Anyhow, here’s my updated Strategic Composite PWP Index after the Group Stages are completed:

CPWP Strategic Index Group Stages CompletedA few explanations to better understand the diagram – I have paired up the teams (color coordinated them) to show the match-ups for the knock-out stages.

This way others can get an idea of how their team CPWP, APWP, and DPWP Indices compare.

I won’t go so far as to say that the team expected to win has their color first but I would offer it may give you an inkling of who might be favored to advance.

Finally, the red bars represent those teams that did not move on to the knock-out stages.

The knock-out stage pairings:

Barcelona play Manchester City.

FC Porto play FC Basel.

FC Bayern Munchen play Shakter Donetsk.

Real Madrid play FC Schalke.

Chelsea play Paris Saint Germain.

Borussia Dortmund play Juventus.

Atletico Madrid play Bayer Leverkusen.

Monaco play Arsenal.

So here is how the teams compare in the Strategic Attacking Index:

APWP Strategic Index Group Stages Completed

A few observations…

I’m a firm believer that Defense wins Championships – but I’m also not willing to ignore how effective team attacking performance is in relationship to team defending.

With Barcelona, Bayern, Porto, Chelsea, Arsenal, and Real Madrid being slightly head-and-shoulders above the rest, in attack, it’s likely those teams will put on a great performance.

All told I’d offer those teams will work towards a possession based attack – especially seeing their opponents.  I’d also offer up that Juventus is likely to work towards that style as well.

Teams like Schalke, Dortmund, Donetsk, Leverkusen, Man City, and PSG can show willingness to possess the ball but I think they will cede somewhat more this stage than in the Group Stages.

Teams like Atletico Madrid, FC Basel, and Monaco are )highly) likely to continue to cede possession and play for a swift counter-attacking (almost direct attacking) style of soccer.

Now for the Strategic Defending PWP Index:

DPWP Strategic Index Group Stages Completed

FC Porto have been best, with Bayern, Monaco, Dortmund, Real Madrid, and Barcelona not far behind…

If there is an anticipated blow-out I’d offer Real Madrid is the team most likely to win big – with Porto next up against Basel and Atletico Madrid handling Bayer pretty easily.

As for the others – way too close to call in my opinion – and I’d imagine a huge audience on telly for the Man City/Barcelona match-up – and you can be sure I’ll be watching The Arsenal take on Monaco!

In Closing:

As I noted going into this competition – all these teams are good – what follows as pucker time nears – is the separation of good from great…

If you want a taste on my approach in measuring luck – consider this – Athletic Club had just seven points earned yet they were 7th best in team defending performance and 13th best in the overall Composite Index performance…  if any team was unlucky, in the Group Stages, it was Athletic Club.

On the flip side – if any team was lucky, in the Group Stages, it was FC Basel (who also had just seven points earned) – they were 16th best in team defending performance, 22nd best in team attacking performance, and 20th best in overall Composite Index performance.

Best, Chris

COPYRIGHT, All Rights Reserved.  PWP – Trademark

You can follow me on twitter @chrisgluckpwp

UEFA Champions League – Let the games begin…

Well, it’s started – the World Cup of League Football for most; at least in my eyes that is.

Who’s going to come out on top and who’s not?

Of course these teams are the best of the best (so-to-speak) and that means I won’t be using words/phrases like sucks, bottom dweller, or some other derogatory term to describe loser.

In other words no comparisons to Chivas USA, Newcastle (sorry lads and I did see Alan Pardew is under fire already), Levante or some other team not starting/doing well in regular season competition.

On to the Family of Indices in Possession with Purpose – but before going there a few obligatory reminders, on things past, in a competition such as the Champions League.

In case you missed it I took my possession with purpose analytical approach to the World Cup this year and here’s a reminder on how things started and then how things ended

As a refresh, the Composite PWP Strategic Index diagrams are provided below for that prestigious event:  How it started…

CPWP After Game 2 Group Stages

CPWP After Game 2 Group Stages

 And… how it ended:

CPWP INDEX JULY 9TH 2014 WORLD CUP

CPWP INDEX JULY 9TH 2014 WORLD CUP

Notice that the trends after Game 2 seem to be pretty consistent (in terms of what teams performed better and worse) all the way through to the final.

The overall R2 (correlation to average points scored) to the Final CPWP Index was .82; Goal Differential was .89.  The DPWP Strategic Index R2 was -.81 and the APWP Strategic Index was .65.

The Goals Scored R2 to average points was .69 and the R2 for Goals Against was -.74.

To be sure I was a bit surprised on how well the Family of Indices played out.

I’m hopeful the relationship will be somewhat near the same for the UEFA Champions League competition.

So how do the CPWP, APWP, and DPWP Indices show after Game 1?  

Well, it’s a bit earlier than the World Cup Indices but the intent here is to 1) let you know I’m tracking the Champions League this year, and 2) all the Index outputs will be made available for consideration.

CPWP Strategic Index Group Stages Game 1

CPWP Strategic Index Group Stages Game 1

Seems pretty clear that FC Porto would be where they are given the 6-0 romp over Bate Borisov.

It’s still very early days so we’ll leave it at that and just note that their were five draws.

Here’s the Attacking PWP Strategic Index offering up the first to worst team performances in Attack:

APWP Strategic Index Group Stages Game 1

APWP Strategic Index Group Stages Game 1

Perhaps a surprise in seeing Roma ahead of FC Porto?  Why is that?  

A couple of reasons and the last one, in my opinion, is the most telling one on who may proceed a bit further:

  1. Roma had 91.07% passing accuracy compared to FC Porto’s 86.65%
  2. Possession was basically equal (~67% each)
  3. Roma was 55% accurate in scoring goals based upon shots on goal; while FC Porto was 50% accurate.
  4. Roma had a 69.23% accuracy rating in having their Shots Taken end up on goal, as opposed to FC Porto (also very high) who was 60% accurate.
  5. Now for the final difference, and most telling in my view — FC Porto generated 23.53% Shots Taken per penetrating possession – while Roma generated just 11.40%.

Why do I have that one last, when it also shows that FC Porto exceeded Roma by over 10%?

The reason why gets back to patience, along with time and space…

Roma was patient.  They statistically, give the appearance, that they waited for better opportunities to take shots (more time and space to shoot) and that reduced volume of shots, per penetration, ended up generating a 9.23% difference in goals scored.

This is type of pattern, that good teams continue to show in Possession with Purpose analysis, reinforces for me that the ‘unmeasured’ amount of time and space has as much, if not more value, than the location of the shot taken.

As a reminder – here’s three previous articles speaking to that in better detail…

On to the Defending PWP Strategic Index and the teams performing best/worst in that area:

DPWP Strategic Index Group Stages Game 1

DPWP Strategic Index Group Stages Game 1

Juventus take the top spot – even ahead of the possession and passing mad Barcelona, the biggest difference really comes down to one team defending statistic:

With Juventus, Malmo FF completed only 36% of  their passes within the Juventus Defending Final Third.

While APOEL Nicosia were able to complete 56% of their passes within the Barcelona Defending Final Third.

Perhaps this is down to how deep or how shallow the back four for each team lined up in the defending half?

Perhaps not?

However viewed it should be noted APOEL Nicosia had fewer passes attempted, in total (292) , than Barcelona had attempted in the Nicosia Final Third (303).

Wow…  Not unlike the same run of play that Barcelona sees in La Liga.  But is that indicative of a team that is going to win the Champions League?

It didn’t work last year… I guess we will see.

In Closing:

It’s only one game – and trends can never be seen with just one game.

They do, however, provide a starting point for a trend.

Best, Chris

COPYRIGHT, All Rights Reserved.  PWP – Trademark